School Types and Educational Outcomes in Kazakhstan

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31489/2026ec3/1296

Keywords:

school types, educational outcomes, Unified National Test, post-secondary destinations, selection, school effects

Abstract

Kazakhstan's secondary education system encompasses a remarkably diverse array of school types, ranging from highly selective exam-based institutions to small rural schools. This study examines how school type is associated with academic performance and post-secondary destinations using administrative data on the full population of 499,150 high school graduates from 2021 to 2023. We classify schools into 19 mutually exclusive categories and estimate ordinary least squares regressions for log-transformed Unified National Test scores and logistic regressions with average marginal effects for five post-secondary outcomes: university enrollment, vocational education, study abroad, employment, and not in education, employment, or training status. Graduates of the most selective schools score 24 to 33 percent higher on the Unified National Test and are 12 to 25 percentage points more likely to enroll in university than regular urban school graduates. At the other end of the spectrum, sport school graduates score 24 percent lower and are channeled primarily into vocational education, while military school graduates are 45 percentage points more likely to be not in education, employment, or training, likely reflecting post-graduation service obligations. We argue that these large associations between school type and outcomes primarily reflect selection: families with greater resources sort their children into higher-performing school types, and the observed school type premiums capture the combined effects of student selection, peer composition, and institutional quality that cannot be disentangled in an observational framework.

References

Abdulkadiroglu, A., Angrist, J., & Pathak, P. (2014). The elite illusion: Achievement effects at Boston and New York exam schools. Econometrica, 82(1), 137–196. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10266

Barrow, L., Sartain, L., & de la Torre, M. (2020). Increasing access to selective high schools through place-based affirmative action: Unintended consequences. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12(4), 135–163. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170599

Chankseliani, M., Gorgodze, S., Janashia, S., & Kurakbayev, K. (2020). Rural disadvantage in the context of centralised university admissions: A multiple case study of Georgia and Kazakhstan. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(7), 995–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1761294

Clark, D. (2010). Selective schools and academic achievement. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 10(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.1917

Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

Dobbie, W., & Fryer, R. G., Jr. (2014). The impact of attending a school with high-achieving peers: Evidence from the New York City exam schools. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(3), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.6.3.58

Downey, D. B., & Condron, D. J. (2016). Fifty years since the Coleman Report: Rethinking the relationship between schools and inequality. Sociology of Education, 89(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040716651676

Epple, D., & Romano, R. E. (1998). Competition between private and public schools, vouchers, and peer-group effects. American Economic Review, 88(1), 33–62.

Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24(3), 1141–1177.

Hanushek, E. A. (2003). The failure of input-based schooling policies. The Economic Journal, 113(485), F64–F98. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00099

Hoxby, C. M. (2003). School choice and school productivity: Could school choice be a tide that lifts all boats? In C. M. Hoxby (Ed.), The economics of school choice (pp. 287–341). University of Chicago Press.

Jackson, C. K. (2010). Do students benefit from attending better schools? Evidence from rule-based student assignments in Trinidad and Tobago. The Economic Journal, 120(549), 1399–1429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02371.x

Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., & Michelson, S. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. Basic Books.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume II): Where all students can succeed. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en

Pop-Eleches, C., & Urquiola, M. (2013). Going to a better school: Effects and behavioral responses. American Economic Review, 103(4), 1289–1324. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.4.1289

Raudenbush, S. W., & Willms, J. D. (1995). The estimation of school effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20(4), 307–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165304

Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teachers College Record, 107(9), 1999–2045. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810810700905

Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x

Shamshidinova, K., Ayubayeva, N., & Bridges, D. (2014). Implementing radical change: Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools as agents of change. In D. Bridges (Ed.), Education reform and internationalisation: The case of school reform in Kazakhstan (pp. 71–82). Cambridge University Press.

Shi, Y. (2020). Who benefits from selective education? Evidence from elite boarding school admissions. Economics of Education Review, 74, 101907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.07.001

Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417

Smith-Woolley, E., Pingault, J.-B., Selzam, S., Rimfeld, K., Krapohl, E., von Stumm, S., Asbury, K., Dale, P. S., Young, T., Allen, R., Kovas, Y., & Plomin, R. (2018). Differences in exam performance between pupils attending selective and non-selective schools mirror the genetic differences between them. npj Science of Learning, 3(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0019-8

van Ewijk, R., & Sleegers, P. (2010). The effect of peer socioeconomic status on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.001

Wu, J., Wei, X., Zhang, H., & Zhou, X. (2019). Elite schools, magnet classes, and academic performances: Regression-discontinuity evidence from China. China Economic Review, 55, 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.03.004

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Tleuzhanuly, K. (2026). School Types and Educational Outcomes in Kazakhstan. BUKETOV BUSINESS REVIEW, 12331(3), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.31489/2026ec3/1296

Issue

Section

Innovations in Management, Marketing, Finance, Accounting, Economics and Public Administration.