Online First

Energy-saving policy and economic performance in Kazakhstan: A structured systematic-narrative review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31489/bbr.2026/1337

Keywords:

energy efficiency, energy-saving policy, GDP energy intensity, economic growth, productivity, green economy

Abstract

This article examines the conditions under which energy-saving and energy-efficiency policies can improve economic performance in Kazakhstan. It applies a structured systematic-narrative review to 29 substantive peer-reviewed studies published from January 2021 to July 2026 in journals indexed in Scopus and/or the Web of Science. Three methodological sources informed the review design and reporting, while six official and institutional sources established the national energy and policy baseline. Candidate studies were identified through documented keyword combinations across publisher platforms and digital object identifier metadata, assessed against explicit eligibility criteria, and coded by research design, sector, outcome, evidential status, limitation, and relevance to Kazakhstan. The synthesis distinguishes causal results, associations, modelled effects, and untested mechanisms across six channels: production costs and productivity; investment and innovation; employment and skills; competitiveness and structural change; household welfare and distribution; and fiscal, environmental, and energy-security effects. Evidence generally links higher energy productivity to stronger firm performance and identifies potential employment and welfare gains, but effect sizes vary across sectors and institutions. Rebound, weak additionality, limited finance, regulated energy prices, and fragmented implementation can substantially reduce net benefits. These qualifications are material for Kazakhstan, where coal represented 47.2% of primary energy consumption in 2024 and gross domestic product energy intensity was approximately 0.304 tonnes of oil equivalent per thousand constant 2015 United States dollars. The review's novel contribution is an evidence architecture that connects policy instruments to verified savings and then to observable economic outcomes while assessing the transferability of international findings to Kazakhstan. It shows that energy-saving policy can support productivity, resilience, and welfare, but is not an automatic driver of economic growth. Based on the synthesis, the authors propose a Kazakhstan-specific policy agenda combining enforceable standards, quality audits, credible measurement and verification, targeted finance, gradual tariff reform with social protection, and domestic capability development. These recommendations and the associated monitoring indicators are interpretive outputs of the review; their combined effectiveness in Kazakhstan remains to be evaluated.

References

Berger, F., Brunzema, I., Rao, S., Vondung, F., Hachenberger, P., & Schlomann, B. (2025). Evaluating co-benefits of energy efficiency policy measures: A holistic framework with case studies from Germany. Energy Efficiency, 18(105). DOI: 10.1007/s12053-025-10397-z

Berner, A., Bruns, S.B., Moneta, A., & Stern, D.I. (2022). Do energy efficiency improvements reduce energy use? Empirical evidence on the economy-wide rebound effect in Europe and the United States. Energy Economics, 110(105939). DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105939

Brockway, P.E., Sorrell, S., Semieniuk, G., Heun, M.K., & Court, V. (2021). Energy efficiency and economy-wide rebound effects: A review of the evidence and its implications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 141(110781). DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110781

Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2025). Fuel and energy balance of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2024). City: Publisher. stat.gov.kz. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.kz/en/industries/business-statistics/stat-energy/publications/411630/

Caragliu, A. (2021). Energy efficiency-enhancing policies and firm performance: Evidence from the paper and glass industries in Italy. Energy Policy, 156(112415). DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112415

Chatterjee, S., Rafa, N., & Nandy, A. (2022). Welfare, development, and cost-efficiency: A global synthesis on incentivizing energy efficiency measures through co-benefits. Energy Research & Social Science, 89(102666). DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102666

Chen, T., Zhang, Y., Jiang, C., & Li, H. (2023). How does energy efficiency affect employment? Evidence from Chinese cities. Energy, 280(128071). DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128071

Darmais, A., Glachant, M., & Kahn, V. (2024). Social equity provisions in energy efficiency obligations: An ex-post analysis of the French program. Energy Policy, 195(114348). DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114348

Dyussembekova, N., Temirgaliyeva, N., Umyshev, D., Shavdinova, M., Schuett, R., & Bektalieva, D. (2022). Assessment of energy efficiency measures’ impact on energy performance in the educational building of Kazakh-German University in Almaty. Sustainability, 14(16), 9813. DOI: 10.3390/su14169813

Filipović, S., Orlov, A., & Andrejević Panić, A. (2024). Key forecasts and prospects for green transition in the region of Central Asia beyond 2022. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 14(25). DOI: 10.1186/s13705-024-00457-0

Fowlie, M., & Meeks, R. (2021). The economics of energy efficiency in developing countries. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 15(2), 238–260. DOI: 10.1086/715606

García-Quevedo, J., & Jové-Llopis, E. (2021). Environmental policies and energy efficiency investments: An industry-level analysis. Energy Policy, 156(112461). DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112461

Concept for the development of energy saving and energy efficiency in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2023–2029 (Resolution No. 264, March 28, 2023) (2023). adilet.zan.kz. Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P2300000264

Action plan for implementation of the Concept for transition of the Republic of Kazakhstan to a green economy for 2024–2030 (Resolution No. 1019, November 29, 2024) (2024). adilet.zan.kz. Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P2400001019

Hajiyev, N., Guliyev, V., Abdullayeva, S., & Abdullayeva, E. (2023). Energy intensity of the economy in the context of rethinking growth within a limited planet. Energy Strategy Reviews, 50(101246). DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2023.101246

Howie, P., & Akhmetov, D. (2024). Socio-economic constraints to low-carbon transitions: Insights from Kazakhstan’s Emissions Trading Scheme. Climate Policy, 1–14. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2337178

International Energy Agency. (2022). Kazakhstan 2022: Energy sector review. City: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/73d1d69f-en

Jové-Llopis, E., & Trujillo-Baute, E. (2024). Escaping the energy poverty trap: Policy assessment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 87, 3335–3355. DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00918-2

Kuziboev, B., Saidmamatov, O., Khodjaniyazov, E., Ibragimov, J., Marty, P., Ruzmetov, D., Matyakubov, U., Lyulina, E., & Ibadullaev, D. (2024). CO2 emissions, remittances, energy intensity and economic development: The evidence from Central Asia. Economies, 12(4), 95. DOI: 10.3390/economies12040095

Mandel, T., Pató, Z., Broc, J.-S., & Eichhammer, W. (2022). Conceptualising the energy efficiency first principle: Insights from theory and practice. Energy Efficiency, 15, Article 41. DOI: 10.1007/s12053-022-10053-w

Mikulić, D., Keček, D., & Slijepčević, S. (2021). Economic and regional spillovers of energy efficiency investments in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 253, 111518. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111518

Montalbano, P., Nenci, S., & Vurchio, D. (2022). Energy efficiency and productivity: A worldwide firm-level analysis. The Energy Journal, 43(5), 93–116. DOI: 10.5547/01956574.43.5.pmon

Mouraviev, N. (2021). Renewable energy in Kazakhstan: Challenges to policy and governance. Energy Policy, 149, 112051. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112051

Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M.M., Li, T., Loder, E.W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71

Papantonis, D., Tzani, D., Burbidge, M., Bouzarovski, S., Stavrakas, V., & Flamos, A. (2022). How to improve energy efficiency policies to address energy poverty? Literature and stakeholder insights for private rented housing in Europe. Energy Research & Social Science, 93, 102832. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102832

President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2023). Strategy for achieving carbon neutrality of the Republic of Kazakhstan by 2060 (Decree No. 121, February 2, 2023). adilet.zan.kz. Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/U2300000121 [in English].

Radovanović, M., Filipović, S., & Andrejević Panić, A. (2021). Sustainable energy transition in Central Asia: Status and challenges. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 11, Article 49. DOI: 10.1186/s13705-021-00324-2

Raihan, A., & Tuspekova, A. (2022). Role of economic growth, renewable energy, and technological innovation to achieve environmental sustainability in Kazakhstan. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 100165. DOI: 10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100165

Saunders, H.D., Roy, J., Azevedo, I.M.L., Chakravarty, D., Dasgupta, S., de la Rue du Can, S., Druckman, A., Fouquet, R., Grubb, M., Lin, B., Lowe, R., Madlener, R., McCoy, D.M., Mundaca, L., Oreszczyn, T., Sorrell, S., Stern, D.I., Tanaka, K., & Wei, T. (2021). Energy efficiency: What has research delivered in the last 40 years? Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46, 135–165. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-084937

Sauer, P.C., & Seuring, S. (2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: A guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions. Review of Managerial Science, 17, 1899–1933. DOI: 10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3

Shevyakova, A., Petrenko, Y., Koshebayeva, G., & Ulybyshev, D. (2022). Peculiarities of housing and communal services and the difficulties of implementing energy-saving technologies: The case of Kazakhstan. Energies, 15(20), 7576. DOI: 10.3390/en15207576

Shi, X., Tian, B., Yang, L., Yu, J., & Zhou, S. (2023). How do regulatory environmental policies perform? A case study of China’s Top-10,000 enterprises energy-saving program. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 187, 113734. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113734

Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2023). Systematic-narrative hybrid literature review: A strategy for integrating a concise methodology into a manuscript. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7, 100381. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100381

World Bank. (2022). Kazakhstan country climate and development report. documents1.worldbank.org. Retrieved from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099420411012246024/pdf/P1773690ad92b401b089700f5be8659ecf0.pdf [in English].

Zhai, X., Juman, J., Makulova, A.T., Khamzayeva, A.V., & Du, B. (2024). Research on relationship between energy consumption and GDP in Kazakhstan. Economies, 12(8), 212. DOI: 10.3390/economies12080212

Zhang, D., Wei, T., & Affuso, E. (2025). Credit constraints and energy efficiency: Evidence from manufacturing firms. Energy Efficiency, 18, Article 65. DOI: 10.1007/s12053-025-10355-9

Zhakiyev, N., Burkhanova, D., Nurkanat, A., Zhussipkaliyeva, S., Sospanova, A., & Khamzina, A. (2025). Green energy in grey areas: The financial and policy challenges of Kazakhstan’s energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 124, 104046. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2025.104046

Zhakiyev, N., Khamzina, A., Zhakiyeva, S., De Miglio, R., Bakdolotov, A., & Cosmi, C. (2023). Optimization modelling of the decarbonization scenario of the total energy system of Kazakhstan until 2060. Energies, 16(13), 5142. DOI: 10.3390/en16135142

Downloads

Published

2026-11-06

How to Cite

Mukan, M., & Naikina, D. (2026). Energy-saving policy and economic performance in Kazakhstan: A structured systematic-narrative review. BUKETOV BUSINESS REVIEW. https://doi.org/10.31489/bbr.2026/1337

Issue

Section

Innovations in Management, Marketing, Finance, Accounting, Economics and Public Administration.