Human capital in the field of commercialization: assessment of the competencies of technology transfer specialists
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31489/2025ec1/43-51Keywords:
human capital, competencies of specialists, hard-skills, soft- skills, interrelation between industry and universities, innovationAbstract
This research article examines the crucial role of human capital in the commercialization of scientific research. It high-lights the "Valley of Death", the gap between scientific innovations and their market application, especially in countries moving from planned economies to market-oriented structures. The study highlights the need for trained Technology Transfer Specialists (TTP) who serve as intermediaries between academia and industry, facilitating the transformation of research results into commercially viable products and services. These specialists should have a wide range of quali-ties. The authors analyze the competencies required for TTP, dividing them into basic skills such as technical under-standing and intellectual property management, and soft skills including communication and strategic thinking. The study has identified significant gaps in the current TTP competencies in Kazakhstan and highlights the urgent need for specialized training programs. The recommendations include the creation of targeted educational initiatives, reviewing university hiring practices to attract professionals with business acumen, and creating opportunities for continuous pro-fessional development. The aim of the study is to increase the efficiency of commercialization offices and, ultimately, contribute to the development of Kazakhstan's innovation ecosystem and economic growth. This study provides a methodological framework for further educational initiatives in the field of technology transfer
References
Dean T., Zhang H., & Xiao Y. (2022). The role of complexity in the Valley of Death and radical innovation per-formance. Technovation, 109, 102160.
Moradlou H. et al. (2023). Using not-for-profit innovation networks to transition new technologies across the valley of death. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 44, 3, 591–616.
Calza F. et al. (2020). Moving drug discoveries beyond the valley of death: the role of innovation ecosystems. European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Publishing Limited, 24, 4, 1184–1209.
Inzelt A, (2015). Re-aligning the Triple Helix in post-Soviet Armenia. Triple Helix, 2, (15).
WIPO. Global Innovation Index 2023, 15th Edition. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2023/index.html
de las Heras-Rosas C. & Herrera J. (2021). Research Trends in Open Innovation and the Role of the University. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7, 1, 29.
Ferdinands R., Azam S.M.F., & Khatibi A. (2023). The work in progress of a developing nation’s Triple Helix and its impact on patent commercialization. The case of Sri Lanka. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 839-862.
Takata M. et al. (2022). Nurturing entrepreneurs: How do technology transfer professionals bridge the Valley of Death in Japan? Technovation, 109, 102161.
Gao J.H. -H., & Haworth N. (2016). Servicing academics and building relationships: the case of two university commercialisation offices in Australia. R&D Management, 46, 2, 653–663.
Mom T.J.M., Oshri I., & Volberda H.W. (2012). The skills base of technology transfer professionals. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 188, 9, 871–891.
Sapir A. (2021). Brokering knowledge, monitoring compliance: technology transfer professionals on the bounda-ry between academy and industry. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 43, 3, 248–263.
Cerpentier M. et al. (2024). Employment protection laws and the commercialization of new products: A cross-country study. Research Policy, 53, 7, 105039.
Tolin G. & Piccaluga A. (2025). Commercializing technology from university-industry collaborations: A configu-rational perspective on organizational factors. Journal of Business Research, 24, 115105.
Kenzhaliyev O.B. et al. (2021). Conditions to facilitate commercialization of R & D in case of Kazakhstan. Tech-nology in Society, 67, 101792.
Medlin C.J., & Törnroos J. -Å. (2015). Exploring and exploiting network relationships to commercialize technol-ogy: A biofuel case. Industrial Marketing Management, 49, 42–52.
Munoz-Penas J., Clarke A.H., & Evald M.R. (2024). Building a commercialization capability: A dynamic capabil-ity view. Industrial Marketing Management, 117, 344–355.
Halilem N. & Diop B. (2025). “Meet me at the backdoor”: A multiple case study of academic entrepreneurs by-passing their technology transfer offices. Research Policy. 54, 2, 105156.
Nieto Cubero J., Gbadegeshin S.A., & Consolación C. Commercialization of disruptive innovations: Literature review and proposal for a process framework. International Journal of Innovation Studies. 2021, 5, 3, 127–144.
Sohail K., Belitski M., & Castro Christiansen L. (2023). Developing business incubation process frameworks: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 162, 113902.
Huegel M. (2024). University scientists’ multiple goals achievement: Social capital and its impact on research performance and research commercialization. Technovation, 135, 103065.
Ismail K. et al. (2012). Problems on Commercialization of Genetically Modified Crops in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 40, 353–357.
Modic D. & Suklan J. (2022). Multidimensional experience and performance of highly skilled administrative staff: Evidence from a technology transfer office. Research Policy, 51, 10, 104562.
Ismail N., Nor M.J.M., & Sidek S. (2015). A Framework for a Successful Research Products Commercialization: A Case of Malaysian Academic Researchers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 195, 283–292.
Albats E., Bogers M., & Podmetina D. (2020). Companies’ human capital for university partnerships: A micro-foundational perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120085.
Schoonenboom J., Johnson R.B. (2017). How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69, 2, 107–131.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 BUKETOV BUSINESS REVIEW
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
